About the Post

Author Information

Hayder is a Researcher at the Centre for Academic Shi’a Studies. He is also a postgraduate student at the Centre for International Studies and Diplomacy, SOAS. You can follow him on Twitter @Hayder_alKhoei

Obama’s Speech: The Elephant in the room

President Obama’s speech on Thursday at the State Department was neither groundbreaking nor surprising. Despite the rhetoric from both Secretary of State Clinton who spoke briefly before the President about a “bold new approach” in US foreign policy, and Obama himself who bespeaks a “new chapter in American diplomacy”, the realities on the ground tell a different story.

The speech was an eloquent, but not substantive, 45-minute charade about an America that is trying to portray itself as a friend of the people of the Middle East. The truth of the matter is no one can cover up the history of America’s alliances with the dictators who are enemies of their own people and this relationship still defines much of US foreign policy in the region albeit with Mubarak and Ben Ali out of commission. The US needn’t worry on this front; they have plenty of other Arab dictators who are still keeping them company.

Obama can indeed provide an emotional chronology of events in Tunisia, starting from the self-immolation of Bouazizi to Ben Ali’s unceremonious departure, but where was American condemnation, à la remarks on Syria, Iran and Libya, when his allies in Tunis were opening fire on innocent pro-democracy protests in the early days of that revolution?

Obama spoke passionately about the rights of women and the need to have “their voices heard”, but throughout his entire speech, he did not once mention Saudi Arabia, where women are not even allowed to drive cars, where people are still beheaded, and by America’s own admission, the world’s largest source of funds for terrorist groups.

Egypt was mentioned 18 times, Tunisia 10 times, Iran 9 times, Syria 8 times Libya 7 times, Bahrain 6 times, but interestingly, Saudi Arabia, one of the regions most obvious, and most powerful, dictatorships, did not even merit a fleeting comment by the American President. There’s no need to get into the economics of America’s relationship with the Arab world, but their interest in “securing the free flow of commerce” may provide a clue as to why he was so mute on Saudi’s horrific human rights record.

Obama was undoubtedly right when he argued, “no development strategy can be based solely upon what comes out of the ground” but maybe the world would be a better place if the US did not base their foreign policy on what comes out of the ground too.

It would be interesting to see if Obama could tell the pro-democracy protesters in Bahrain, whilst keeping a straight face, that “America’s interests are not hostile to peoples’ hopes.” He was not as silent on Bahrain as he was with Saudi Arabia but when he speaks about the “difficulties of enforcing regime change” he could perhaps start with simply not supporting oppressive regimes in the first place. He argues it was “not America that put people into the streets of Tunis and Cairo” but the irony is it is America that keeps dictators in their palaces in Riyadh and Manama.

It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that when Obama says Bahrain is a “long-standing partner and we are committed to its security” and that the “Bahraini government has a legitimate interest in the rule of law” what he is really saying is the pro-democracy movement may as well give up because their plight means nothing when the US Fifth Fleet is in their backyard. Unlike fellow Arabs who witnessed their dictators fall, with American blessing eventually, the closest they can get to political reform is empty promises of dialogue.

Compare the words Obama used to describe the tragedy in Bahrain, “mass arrests” and “brute force” with Syria, where Assad chose the “path of murder” or Libya, where Gaddafi “launched war against his own people” and you begin to realise that despite his own words, “we cannot hesitate to stand squarely on the side of those who are reaching for their rights,” there is evidently a between-the-lines disclaimer that reads “but only if your rights stand in the way of our interests”

America doesn’t always get it wrong, and sometimes they do act decisively to end evil regimes, but you would hope, if only for their sake, they would stop creating, or ignoring, ticking time bombs.

7 Comments on “Obama’s Speech: The Elephant in the room”

  1. Sara May 22, 2011 at 2:26 pm #

    He didn’t mention Iraqi neither. Interesting. That conveys enough.

  2. C.H. May 26, 2011 at 7:54 am #

    “Compare the words Obama used to describe the tragedy in Bahrain, “mass arrests” and “brute force” with Syria, where Assad chose the “path of murder” or Libya, where Gaddafi “launched war against his own people”

    As horrible as it may be watching the crackdown unfold in Bahrain, Assad and Qaddafi have mass murdered 30 or 40 times as many people as the Khalifa family. Politics aside, the situations are much worse. Also, Obama was much more supportive the the Egyptian people in 2011 than he was to the Iranians in 2009.

  3. Jay May 28, 2011 at 7:30 am #

    Hayder that was brilliant!! Thank you so much for this wonderful piece.

  4. Hayder al-Khoei May 28, 2011 at 8:36 am #

    Thank you Jay.

    Corey, of course every country is unique is one way or another, and no two situations are exactly the same, and of course if you want to do a body count than Bahrain would not equal even a city in Libya or Syria (it is a tiny country after all) but there are just two things I would like to say on this point.

    Firstly, though the numbers may be incomparable, the future consequences of this conflict, ie the flaming of sectarian tensions, make Bahrain a very dangerous case and so it not as simple as counting dead bodies and saying country X is worse than country Y.

    Secondly, and more importantly, regardless of numbers the US, and UK, and Europe, are very clearly showing double standards when it comes to Bahrain. They are prepared to look the other way when it comes to Bahrain, or simply issue a few statements here and there, but nothing like how they have reacted in Libya, Syria or Iran. If that isn’t hypocrisy, I don’t know what is.

  5. Zoologist June 5, 2011 at 12:57 am #

    But Hayder ya habbib, there are no elephants indeginious to the Middle East, so there is not any in the room and Mr. Presdent Obama knows it!

  6. Mark @ Israel June 11, 2011 at 3:26 pm #

    Obama is really trying to impress the Middle East people but one should not be deceived by his eloquence. Whatever he said may just be plain lip service and there is nothing to it that we should expect.

  7. Dennis June 5, 2013 at 10:21 pm #

    Hayder, I like you, and I am no fan of Obama, but I think America deserves a bit of credit for siding with the protesters over Mubarak, who was a very close US ally.

    If the US simply stopped support the Saudi regime there’s no indication a democratic government would take its place. Libya, Eygpt, etc. all had an “army” of pro-Democracy protestors waiting to fill the power vacuum. However, in Saudi Arabia, Al Qaeda seems to be the second biggest player in the nation after the Saudi government, and I think its entirely likely THEY would fill the void if the Saudi King just disappeared, so unless the US sent troops to ensure a transition to democracy, I think another Anbar would be the result.

    Remember, Saudi Arabia coddles anti-American terrorists, teaches its children to hate infidels, and supplied all of the 9/11 hijackers. No one would like to see Saudi Arabia become more “moderate” than America would. But just because a tyranny disappears does not necessarily mean a democracy fills the void. Heck, look at your native Iraq: even WITH United States troops and trillions of dollars poured into the Iraqi Army, your nation nearly got taken over by Sadrists and the kind of people who put sheep in diapers. The real reason the US backs to the unsavory Saudi government is only because its a major player against Al Qaeda, who would be even worse both for America AND for the Arabian people.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: